N20m Property Scam: Lawyer Sulyman Abaya Lied, We Never Apologized For Arresting Him – EFCC

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in a statement has said it has no reason to threaten or apologize to Sulyman Abaya,
a lawyer and one of the suspects being investigated in a N20 million
property fraud case by the Ilorin Zonal office of the Commission.

Abaya was arrested along with two other lawyers, Salman Rafiu and
Saka Hammed, for alleged illegal acquisition and sale of a property
belonging to Mr Adetunji Adedoyin, valued at about N20 million (Twenty
Million Naira).


Adedoyin alleged in a petition that the suspects fraudulently
obtained a court judgment with which they claimed and sold his property
without his knowledge and consent. In getting the judgement, the
suspects ensured that their victim, the petitioner did not get summons.
Instead, they went ahead and provided defence lawyers for him, with whom
he never had any discussion.

According to him, “I was informed that I was served summons all
through the court proceedings, whereas it was R.A. Salman who put up his
colleagues: Abaya Sulyman and Saka Hammed to stand for me and these
lawyers forged my signature on some documents purporting my consent in
court to the sale of my hostel”.

Adedoyin further stated that “the truth of the matter is that I
never set my eyes on these people (lawyers) prior to or during the court
proceedings, neither did I participate directly or indirectly in the
proceedings. I also was not aware of the proceedings from the beginning
to the end.”

Abaya was arrested on August 28, 2019 and released on bail after
volunteering statement to the Commission. However in a twist, the
suspect addressed the media in Ilorin on September 2, 2019, claiming he
was innocent of the allegations against him and that operatives of the
Commission, having realized their mistake, had apologized to him. He
also added that he was profiled at gun-point.

To all intent and purposes, these are bouquet of lies packaged to
elicit public sympathy and portray the Commission as inefficient,
reckless and draconian.

In the first place, there is no reason for anyone to apologize to
Abaya who remains a suspect under investigation. Apparently, Abaya has
mistaken or deliberately wants to construe the administrative bail
offered him by the Commission as exoneration of criminal complicity in
the alleged fraud. The facts of the case suggest otherwise. He was
merely offered bail to preserve his rights pending the conclusion of

Without prejudice to the facts of the case, it is puzzling that a
lawyer of Abaya’s standing would take a brief from third parties on
behalf of a client who is not incapacitated and that lives in the same
city with him.

For the record, it is not the practice of the EFCC to force suspects
to be profiled. Taking mug shot of suspects of crime is standard
procedure in criminal investigation. It beats the imagination why Abaya
would want to be treated differently.

About thecitimedia 7738 Articles
They say go hard or go home. Hey y'all, I'm Home.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply